Friday, October 23, 2015

Benghazi Hearing - Not a Bust!

Benghazi House select committee chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC), having an ample budget in excess of 3 million of dollars - a budget more than what is spent on the committee of veteran affairs or house ethics affairs,  promising to shed new light that the previous six (or is it seven?) Benghazi investigations (many led by Republicans) did not shed, repeatedly assuring that the investigation is not about Hillary Clinton but about the events at Benghazi – despite the statements by the House majority leader Kevin McCarthy and a couple of other republicans that this investigation is all about damaging Hillary Clinton, when asked if he learned something new at the 11 hour long marathon HRC hearing, responded

Chairman of the House select committee on Benghazi after Hillary Clinton's testimony responding to questions from reporters.
"I think some of Jimmy Jordan's questioning -- well, when you say new today, we knew some of that already. We knew about the emails," he said. "In terms of her testimony? I don't know that she testified that much differently today than she has the previous time she testified."

Protestations aside, given the secretive nature of the committee investigation, many conservatives expected new information that showed some cover-up of the Benghazi incident as conservatives suspect.  If comments from conservatives such as radio talk show host Erick Erickson, Washington Examiner’s Byron York, John Podhoretz, and others, is an indication, many conservatives admit that the whole Benghazi committee investigation has been a bust.

No.  It has not been a bust.  

Hillary Clinton testified in the committee with poise, and command over details.  At times, during the 11 hour testimony, she appeared bored, and handled the republican barbs with ease.
By calmly answering hostile questions from Republicans for 11 hours, on live TV, Hillary Clinton proved that there is no reason to fear that she will be too old to run the country, if elected as president.  Many close to Hillary Clinton might have known about her endurance and command of facts, but not the general public.  She should thank the republicans for providing an opportunity to demonstrate her competence in front of a national audience.  

It was clear that beyond insinuations, wild accusations, and general flailing, the house republicans did not have much to ask the former of Secretary of State about policy, or substance.   They missed their opportunity to ask about the US policy and strategy in Libya, policies about hiring private contractors for providing security to US consulates, the implementation of the recommendations by the Accountability Review Board, etc.  Only Tammy Duckworth, a democrat, asked serious, substantive questions.  It is one thing for Hillary Clinton to accuse the committee of partisanship in a democratic debate, it is wholly another for the republicans in the committee to validate that accusation on live TV.